diff options
| author | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-23 10:29:09 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> | 2020-09-27 21:41:08 +0200 |
| commit | 2bf6f962b91123b0474c0f7123cd17efe7f09a66 (patch) | |
| tree | 21f74da9ad3b3eaacf91cd63302bea01f55bedb9 /doc | |
| parent | ff39361c80dfc67a9afe35f315a774140d8cf99b (diff) | |
packages: 'package-input-rewriting/spec' can rewrite implicit dependencies.
With this change, '--with-input', '--with-graft', etc. also apply to
implicit dependencies. Thus, it's now possible to do:
guix build python-itsdangerous --with-input=python-wrapper=python@2
or:
guix build hello --with-graft=glibc=glibc@2.29
Additionally, before, implicit inputs were not rewritten, which could
lead to duplicates in the output of 'bag-transitive-inputs' (packages
that are not 'eq?' but lead to the same derivation). This in turn would
lead to unnecessary rebuilds when using '--with-input' & co. This
change fixes it by ensuring even implicit inputs are rewritten.
Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/42156>.
* guix/packages.scm (package-input-rewriting/spec): Add #:deep?
defaulting to #true, and pass it to 'package-mapping'.
[replacement-property]: New variable.
[rewrite]: Check that property and set it on the result of PROC.
[cut?]: New procedure.
* tests/packages.scm ("package-input-rewriting/spec"): Ensure implicit
inputs were unchanged.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, partial match"): Pass #:deep? #f.
("package-input-rewriting/spec, deep")
("package-input-rewriting/spec, no duplicates"): New tests.
(package/inherit): Move before use.
* tests/guix-build.sh: Add tests.
* tests/scripts-build.scm ("options->transformation, with-graft"):
Compare dependencies by package name or derivation file name.
* doc/guix.texi (Defining Packages): Adjust accordingly.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/guix.texi | 13 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 054449d8d6..e72e1ec130 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -6272,12 +6272,13 @@ This is exactly what the @option{--with-input} command-line option does The following variant of @code{package-input-rewriting} can match packages to be replaced by name rather than by identity. -@deffn {Scheme Procedure} package-input-rewriting/spec @var{replacements} -Return a procedure that, given a package, applies the given @var{replacements} to -all the package graph (excluding implicit inputs). @var{replacements} is a list of -spec/procedures pair; each spec is a package specification such as @code{"gcc"} or -@code{"guile@@2"}, and each procedure takes a matching package and returns a -replacement for that package. +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} package-input-rewriting/spec @var{replacements} [#:deep? #t] +Return a procedure that, given a package, applies the given +@var{replacements} to all the package graph, including implicit inputs +unless @var{deep?} is false. @var{replacements} is a list of +spec/procedures pair; each spec is a package specification such as +@code{"gcc"} or @code{"guile@@2"}, and each procedure takes a matching +package and returns a replacement for that package. @end deffn The example above could be rewritten this way: |