summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/guix/build
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>2021-04-02 18:36:50 -0400
committerMark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>2021-04-15 03:22:55 -0400
commit1bab9b9f17256a9e4f45f5b0cceb8b52e0a1b1ed (patch)
tree751a3b7264c0164ede94ebdafbea35b6cfa027d9 /guix/build
parentabf032c13117bf2074de89082a8ef98b5cc08fad (diff)
grafts: Support rewriting UTF-16 and UTF-32 store references.
Partially fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/33848>. * guix/build/graft.scm (replace-store-references): Add support for finding and rewriting UTF-16 and UTF-32 store references. * tests/grafts.scm: Add tests.
Diffstat (limited to 'guix/build')
-rw-r--r--guix/build/graft.scm281
1 files changed, 190 insertions, 91 deletions
diff --git a/guix/build/graft.scm b/guix/build/graft.scm
index c119ee71d1..f04c35fa74 100644
--- a/guix/build/graft.scm
+++ b/guix/build/graft.scm
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
-;;; Copyright © 2016 Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2016, 2021 Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -55,6 +55,52 @@
(string->char-set "0123456789abcdfghijklmnpqrsvwxyz")
<>))
+(define (nix-base32-char-or-nul? c)
+ "Return true if C is a nix-base32 character or NUL, otherwise return false."
+ (or (nix-base32-char? c)
+ (char=? c #\nul)))
+
+(define (possible-utf16-hash? buffer i w)
+ "Return true if (I - W) is large enough to hold a UTF-16 encoded
+nix-base32 hash and if BUFFER contains NULs in all positions where NULs
+are to be expected in a UTF-16 encoded hash+dash pattern whose dash is
+found at position I. Otherwise, return false."
+ (and (<= (* 2 hash-length) (- i w))
+ (let loop ((j (+ 1 (- i (* 2 hash-length)))))
+ (or (>= j i)
+ (and (zero? (bytevector-u8-ref buffer j))
+ (loop (+ j 2)))))))
+
+(define (possible-utf32-hash? buffer i w)
+ "Return true if (I - W) is large enough to hold a UTF-32 encoded
+nix-base32 hash and if BUFFER contains NULs in all positions where NULs
+are to be expected in a UTF-32 encoded hash+dash pattern whose dash is
+found at position I. Otherwise, return false."
+ (and (<= (* 4 hash-length) (- i w))
+ (let loop ((j (+ 1 (- i (* 4 hash-length)))))
+ (or (>= j i)
+ (and (zero? (bytevector-u8-ref buffer j))
+ (zero? (bytevector-u8-ref buffer (+ j 1)))
+ (zero? (bytevector-u8-ref buffer (+ j 2)))
+ (loop (+ j 4)))))))
+
+(define (insert-nuls char-size bv)
+ "Given a bytevector BV, return a bytevector containing the same bytes but
+with (CHAR-SIZE - 1) NULs inserted between every two adjacent bytes from BV.
+For example, (insert-nuls 4 #u8(1 2 3)) => #u8(1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3)."
+ (if (= char-size 1)
+ bv
+ (let* ((len (bytevector-length bv))
+ (bv* (make-bytevector (+ 1 (* char-size
+ (- len 1)))
+ 0)))
+ (let loop ((i 0))
+ (when (< i len)
+ (bytevector-u8-set! bv* (* i char-size)
+ (bytevector-u8-ref bv i))
+ (loop (+ i 1))))
+ bv*)))
+
(define* (replace-store-references input output replacement-table
#:optional (store (%store-directory)))
"Read data from INPUT, replacing store references according to
@@ -76,9 +122,9 @@ bytevectors to the same value."
(list->vector (map pred (iota 256)))
<>))
- (define nix-base32-byte?
+ (define nix-base32-byte-or-nul?
(optimize-u8-predicate
- (compose nix-base32-char?
+ (compose nix-base32-char-or-nul?
integer->char)))
(define (dash? byte) (= byte 45))
@@ -86,100 +132,153 @@ bytevectors to the same value."
(define request-size (expt 2 20)) ; 1 MiB
;; We scan the file for the following 33-byte pattern: 32 bytes of
- ;; nix-base32 characters followed by a dash. To accommodate large files,
- ;; we do not read the entire file, but instead work on buffers of up to
- ;; 'request-size' bytes. To ensure that every 33-byte sequence appears
- ;; entirely within exactly one buffer, adjacent buffers must overlap,
- ;; i.e. they must share 32 byte positions. We accomplish this by
- ;; "ungetting" the last 32 bytes of each buffer before reading the next
- ;; buffer, unless we know that we've reached the end-of-file.
+ ;; nix-base32 characters followed by a dash. When we find such a pattern
+ ;; whose hash is in REPLACEMENT-TABLE, we perform the required rewrite and
+ ;; continue scanning.
+ ;;
+ ;; To support UTF-16 and UTF-32 store references, the 33 bytes comprising
+ ;; this hash+dash pattern may optionally be interspersed by extra NUL bytes.
+ ;; This simple approach works because the characters we are looking for are
+ ;; restricted to ASCII. UTF-16 hashes are interspersed with single NUL
+ ;; bytes ("\0"), and UTF-32 hashes are interspersed with triplets of NULs
+ ;; ("\0\0\0"). Note that we require NULs to be present only *between* the
+ ;; other bytes, and not at either end, in order to be insensitive to byte
+ ;; order.
+ ;;
+ ;; To accommodate large files, we do not read the entire file at once, but
+ ;; instead work on buffers of up to REQUEST-SIZE bytes. To ensure that
+ ;; every hash+dash pattern appears in its entirety in at least one buffer,
+ ;; adjacent buffers must overlap by one byte less than the maximum size of a
+ ;; hash+dash pattern. We accomplish this by "ungetting" a suffix of each
+ ;; buffer before reading the next buffer, unless we know that we've reached
+ ;; the end-of-file.
(let ((buffer (make-bytevector request-size)))
- (let loop ()
- ;; Note: We avoid 'get-bytevector-n' to work around
- ;; <http://bugs.gnu.org/17466>.
+ (define-syntax-rule (byte-at i)
+ (bytevector-u8-ref buffer i))
+ (let outer-loop ()
(match (get-bytevector-n! input buffer 0 request-size)
((? eof-object?) 'done)
(end
- ;; We scan the buffer for dashes that might be preceded by a
- ;; nix-base32 hash. The key optimization here is that whenever we
- ;; find a NON-nix-base32 character at position 'i', we know that it
- ;; cannot be part of a hash, so the earliest position where the next
- ;; hash could start is i+1 with the following dash at position i+33.
- ;;
- ;; Since nix-base32 characters comprise only 1/8 of the 256 possible
- ;; byte values, and exclude some of the most common letters in
- ;; English text (e t o u), in practice we can advance by 33 positions
- ;; most of the time.
- (let scan-from ((i hash-length) (written 0))
- ;; 'i' is the first position where we look for a dash. 'written'
- ;; is the number of bytes in the buffer that have already been
- ;; written.
+ (define (scan-from i w)
+ ;; Scan the buffer for dashes that might be preceded by nix hashes,
+ ;; where I is the minimum position where such a dash might be
+ ;; found, and W is the number of bytes in the buffer that have been
+ ;; written so far. We assume that I - W >= HASH-LENGTH.
+ ;;
+ ;; The key optimization here is that whenever we find a byte at
+ ;; position I that cannot occur within a nix hash (because it's
+ ;; neither a nix-base32 character nor NUL), we can infer that the
+ ;; earliest position where the next hash could start is at I + 1,
+ ;; and therefore the earliest position for the following dash is
+ ;; (+ I 1 HASH-LENGTH), which is I + 33.
+ ;;
+ ;; Since nix-base32-or-nul characters comprise only about 1/8 of
+ ;; the 256 possible byte values, and exclude some of the most
+ ;; common letters in English text (e t o u), we can advance 33
+ ;; positions much of the time.
(if (< i end)
- (let ((byte (bytevector-u8-ref buffer i)))
- (cond ((and (dash? byte)
- ;; We've found a dash. Note that we do not know
- ;; whether the preceeding 32 bytes are nix-base32
- ;; characters, but we do not need to know. If
- ;; they are not, the following lookup will fail.
- (lookup-replacement
- (string-tabulate (lambda (j)
- (integer->char
- (bytevector-u8-ref buffer
- (+ j (- i hash-length)))))
- hash-length)))
- => (lambda (replacement)
- ;; We've found a hash that needs to be replaced.
- ;; First, write out all bytes preceding the hash
- ;; that have not yet been written.
- (put-bytevector output buffer written
- (- i hash-length written))
- ;; Now write the replacement string.
- (put-bytevector output replacement)
- ;; Since the byte at position 'i' is a dash,
- ;; which is not a nix-base32 char, the earliest
- ;; position where the next hash might start is
- ;; i+1, and the earliest position where the
- ;; following dash might start is (+ i 1
- ;; hash-length). Also, increase the write
- ;; position to account for REPLACEMENT.
- (let ((len (bytevector-length replacement)))
- (scan-from (+ i 1 len)
- (+ i (- len hash-length))))))
- ;; If the byte at position 'i' is a nix-base32 char,
- ;; then the dash we're looking for might be as early as
- ;; the following byte, so we can only advance by 1.
- ((nix-base32-byte? byte)
- (scan-from (+ i 1) written))
- ;; If the byte at position 'i' is NOT a nix-base32
- ;; char, then the earliest position where the next hash
- ;; might start is i+1, with the following dash at
- ;; position (+ i 1 hash-length).
+ (let ((byte (byte-at i)))
+ (cond ((dash? byte)
+ (found-dash i w))
+ ((nix-base32-byte-or-nul? byte)
+ (scan-from (+ i 1) w))
(else
- (scan-from (+ i 1 hash-length) written))))
-
- ;; We have finished scanning the buffer. Now we determine how
- ;; many bytes have not yet been written, and how many bytes to
- ;; "unget". If 'end' is less than 'request-size' then we read
- ;; less than we asked for, which indicates that we are at EOF,
- ;; so we needn't unget anything. Otherwise, we unget up to
- ;; 'hash-length' bytes (32 bytes). However, we must be careful
- ;; not to unget bytes that have already been written, because
- ;; that would cause them to be written again from the next
- ;; buffer. In practice, this case occurs when a replacement is
- ;; made near or beyond the end of the buffer. When REPLACEMENT
- ;; went beyond END, we consume the extra bytes from INPUT.
- (begin
- (if (> written end)
- (get-bytevector-n! input buffer 0 (- written end))
- (let* ((unwritten (- end written))
- (unget-size (if (= end request-size)
- (min hash-length unwritten)
- 0))
- (write-size (- unwritten unget-size)))
- (put-bytevector output buffer written write-size)
- (unget-bytevector input buffer (+ written write-size)
- unget-size)))
- (loop)))))))))
+ (not-part-of-hash i w))))
+ (finish-buffer i w)))
+
+ (define (not-part-of-hash i w)
+ ;; Position I is known to not be within a nix hash that we must
+ ;; rewrite. Therefore, the earliest position where the next hash
+ ;; might start is I + 1, and therefore the earliest position of
+ ;; the following dash is (+ I 1 HASH-LENGTH).
+ (scan-from (+ i 1 hash-length) w))
+
+ (define (found-dash i w)
+ ;; We know that there is a dash '-' at position I, and that
+ ;; I - W >= HASH-LENGTH. The immediately preceding bytes *might*
+ ;; contain a nix-base32 hash, but that is not yet known. Here,
+ ;; we rule out all but one possible encoding (ASCII, UTF-16,
+ ;; UTF-32) by counting how many NULs precede the dash.
+ (cond ((not (zero? (byte-at (- i 1))))
+ ;; The dash is *not* preceded by a NUL, therefore it
+ ;; cannot possibly be a UTF-16 or UTF-32 hash. Proceed
+ ;; to check for an ASCII hash.
+ (found-possible-hash 1 i w))
+
+ ((not (zero? (byte-at (- i 2))))
+ ;; The dash is preceded by exactly one NUL, therefore it
+ ;; cannot be an ASCII or UTF-32 hash. Proceed to check
+ ;; for a UTF-16 hash.
+ (if (possible-utf16-hash? buffer i w)
+ (found-possible-hash 2 i w)
+ (not-part-of-hash i w)))
+
+ (else
+ ;; The dash is preceded by at least two NULs, therefore
+ ;; it cannot be an ASCII or UTF-16 hash. Proceed to
+ ;; check for a UTF-32 hash.
+ (if (possible-utf32-hash? buffer i w)
+ (found-possible-hash 4 i w)
+ (not-part-of-hash i w)))))
+
+ (define (found-possible-hash char-size i w)
+ ;; We know that there is a dash '-' at position I, that
+ ;; I - W >= CHAR-SIZE * HASH-LENGTH, and that the only
+ ;; possible encoding for the preceding hash is as indicated by
+ ;; CHAR-SIZE. Here we check to see if the given hash is in
+ ;; REPLACEMENT-TABLE, and if so, we perform the required
+ ;; rewrite.
+ (let* ((hash (string-tabulate
+ (lambda (j)
+ (integer->char
+ (byte-at (- i (* char-size
+ (- hash-length j))))))
+ hash-length))
+ (replacement* (lookup-replacement hash))
+ (replacement (and replacement*
+ (insert-nuls char-size replacement*))))
+ (cond
+ ((not replacement)
+ (not-part-of-hash i w))
+ (else
+ ;; We've found a hash that needs to be replaced.
+ ;; First, write out all bytes preceding the hash
+ ;; that have not yet been written.
+ (put-bytevector output buffer w
+ (- i (* char-size hash-length) w))
+ ;; Now write the replacement string.
+ (put-bytevector output replacement)
+ ;; Now compute the new values of W and I and continue.
+ (let ((w (+ (- i (* char-size hash-length))
+ (bytevector-length replacement))))
+ (scan-from (+ w hash-length) w))))))
+
+ (define (finish-buffer i w)
+ ;; We have finished scanning the buffer. Now we determine how many
+ ;; bytes have not yet been written, and how many bytes to "unget".
+ ;; If END is less than REQUEST-SIZE then we read less than we asked
+ ;; for, which indicates that we are at EOF, so we needn't unget
+ ;; anything. Otherwise, we unget up to (* 4 HASH-LENGTH) bytes.
+ ;; However, we must be careful not to unget bytes that have already
+ ;; been written, because that would cause them to be written again
+ ;; from the next buffer. In practice, this case occurs when a
+ ;; replacement is made near or beyond the end of the buffer. When
+ ;; REPLACEMENT went beyond END, we consume the extra bytes from
+ ;; INPUT.
+ (if (> w end)
+ (get-bytevector-n! input buffer 0 (- w end))
+ (let* ((unwritten (- end w))
+ (unget-size (if (= end request-size)
+ (min (* 4 hash-length)
+ unwritten)
+ 0))
+ (write-size (- unwritten unget-size)))
+ (put-bytevector output buffer w write-size)
+ (unget-bytevector input buffer (+ w write-size)
+ unget-size)))
+ (outer-loop))
+
+ (scan-from hash-length 0))))))
(define (rename-matching-files directory mapping)
"Apply MAPPING to the names of all the files in DIRECTORY, where MAPPING is